Twitter reacts to Bruins' disallowed OT goal
Upon further review, no goal.
Boston Bruins forward Noal Acciari appeared to score a season-saving overtime goal Friday in Game 5, but it was disallowed after video review due to goaltender interference on the part of Sean Kuraly.
Judge for yourself:
Bruins potential game-winning goal, ruled goaltender interference on the ice pic.twitter.com/fFBGeJQi5D
— Pete Blackburn (@PeteBlackburn) April 22, 2017
The reaction on Twitter was, in a word, befuddled:
Wow. No goal. I think it's a good goal but we could debate it for the next two days & not agree. The issue w/reviewing goalie interference.
— Craig Custance (@CraigCustance) April 22, 2017
<raises hand> I think that's the right call!
— Sean Gentille (@seangentille) April 22, 2017
I see zero goaltender interference on that play.
— Ken Campbell (@THNKenCampbell) April 22, 2017
Ah yes. Now I know what goaltender interference is. And is not. I think. Maybe....
— Travis Yost (@travisyost) April 22, 2017
I have no idea what's a good goal anymore. To me, that one should count.
— Al Muir (@almuirSI) April 22, 2017
Leave it Roberto Luongo to drop some gold:
Good goal cuz a game 6 is good for HRR?
— Strombone (@strombone1) April 22, 2017
No goal cuz Gary hates the players.....
— Strombone (@strombone1) April 22, 2017
A former NHL official also chimed in:
Bruins goal should be good...but??
— Kerry Fraser (@kfraserthecall) April 22, 2017
then again?? Who knows?
— Kerry Fraser (@kfraserthecall) April 22, 2017
Good effort, Bruins.
Excellent “pretend we don't see the ref” fake celebration by the Bruins, by the way.
— Down Goes Brown (@DownGoesBrown) April 22, 2017